Group Projects
Students work together over an extended period of time in structured groups to complete a graded multifaceted project.
Challenges:
What is the balance between group output and
individual student performance?
- What is the balance between product and process?
- How do I address real or perceived free rider program?
Assess Positive Interdependence: Process
- Discuss the criteria for assessing group process before hand. See AAC&U value rubrics.
- Have each student keep a log of group process assessments.
- Collect process assessment at the end of each stage of the project.
- Make peer assessments confidential.
- Have students complete culminating group process evaluation.
- Factor group process evaluations into the determination of individual grade.
Evidence
- Anson and Goodman (2014) found that interim formative peer assessments coupled with timely feedback fostered positive group processes.
- Sprague et al. (2019) supported the effectiveness of peer and self-evaluations to fairly assess students’ contributions to group work.
Advice
Please consider the following recommendations:
▪ Keep peer-evaluations confidential.
▪ Use a mix of quantitative and qualitative questions.
▪ Encourage students to include comments.
Solutions:
- Use positive interdependence and individual accountability as the frameworks for assessment.
- Plan assessment
- Use student learning outcomes as the starting point.
- Explain the purpose of the group assignment.
- Make assessment criteria clear.
Assess Individual Accountability: Product
- Determine grading methods and weightings for product and individual grade.
- Use self and peer-evaluation to achieve individual accountability.
- Have students keep a log of self-included and self-excluded peer-evaluations.
- Collect self and peer-evaluations at the end of each stage.
- Have students complete a peer review rubric at project end.
- Make adjustments for ratings that appear unfair. Grading mechanism should comprise of:
- Product grade (grade or group grade).
- Individual grade: Adjusted up or down based on self and peer-evaluation scores.
References
Anson, R., & Goodman, A. J. (2014). A peer assessment system to improve student team
experiences. Journal of Education for Business, 89, 27-34.
Sprague, M., Wilson, K. F., & McKenzie, K. S. (2019). Evaluating the quality of peer and self evaluations as measures of student contributions to
group projects. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(5), 1061-1074.